Revenue Operations

The RevOps Rocket: The Step-by-Step Guide to your 2025 Revenue Planning

Step by step guide to annual revenue planning, including keeping account scoring update to date, capacity planning, and designing territories.


Welcome back to The RevOps Rocket! This edition is designed for every sales/revenue leader that’s thinking about next year’s revenue goals and feeling lost in how to get there. Annual planning is a pain, and if you’re a young, scrappy startup without a sales or revenue operations team helping, it’s easy to feel lost and overwhelmed. We’re going to fix that!

Today, we’re diving into the planning process from start to finish. This includes:

  • Scoring accounts, likely for the first time, but you could also be ready to validate and update your scores based on your evolving ICP
  • Planning revenue capacity and demand alignment
  • Building equitable sales territories to maximize revenue potential
  • Where the common pitfalls are and how to avoid them

 


 

1. ACCOUNT SCORING

Building territories on bad account scoring data is like going on a treasure hunt with a blind guide. You’ve spent money, resources, and time to prepare for this adventure, but now have no idea if 4 days into your hike you’re even traveling in the right direction.

At its core, Account Scoring should be based on a simple philosophy, Propensity to Spend. This by default implies that your account scores will evolve over time as your product, offering, and market does. By prioritizing who your best customer is today, you’re maximizing the sales team’s likelihood to generate revenue.

First, we define those key metrics for scoring. This is usually a combination of:

  • Firmographics: company size, industry, location, revenue, etc.
  • Historical data: closed/lost and won opportunities, current spend, close rates, etc.
  • Behavioral data: Also called intent, real-time insights into organizations that are visiting your website, review sites (like G2), etc. Behavioral data works best when companies actually know who you are, and you’re in an industry that has large established players with a defined solution your potential customers are searching for. For most small and startup companies, behavioral data is a limited signal without much direction.

 

Next, we weigh each factor based on its impact. If we know that today we’re not a fit for any organization with more than $150M in revenue because we lack SOC II and additional security certifications they require, organizational revenue would be heavily weighted. Our product may also have started as a niche solution for B2B manufacturing orgs, so industry and even sub-industry weight is increased here.

Manually, this process can take weeks or months reviewing spreadsheet data, building models, or cost tens of thousands of dollars to pull in a RevOps consultant (and may still take weeks) to try and score accounts for you. Ideally you have a platform that can automatically review your account data and recommend scoring for you with a few clicks.

Most importantly with scoring, this process should be revisited regularly as your business evolves. Today, account scoring may happen every few years as a set and forget function, with more progressive companies doing it on an annual basis. Your business is growing, changing, improving a lot faster than once per year, and so utilizing technology that can help keep your account scores up to date with your company's speed of change becomes a huge advantage.

Weighting based on firmographics helps you start separating your ICP from the mass of accounts in your CRM.

Being able to drill multiple levels deep in this data hyper-focuses that ICP to your best potential accounts.

It’s critical to be able to go multiple levels deep without adding too much complexity. As you begin this process, it’s important to be aware of the common issues leaders like you run into when scoring, and how you can avoid them.

Over-Complicating the Scoring Model

  • The Trap: Organizations sometimes create overly complex scoring models with too many factors and weightings, which leads to confusion and inconsistencies in prioritization.
  • How to Avoid: Start simple. Focus on the top 3-5 factors that truly move the needle. As your model matures, you can gradually add complexity.

Relying on Outdated Data

  • The Trap: Sales teams often score accounts based on old, inaccurate data. Businesses change rapidly, and your scoring system must keep pace.
  • How to Avoid: Regularly refresh data inputs, and integrate automated data sources where possible. Sync CRM data with other tools like LinkedIn or financial databases to keep account information up to date.

Ignoring Sales Team Feedback

  • The Trap: Relying solely on data-driven inputs without considering on-the-ground insights from your reps can lead to missed opportunities or gaps in your scoring process.
  • How to Avoid: Build a feedback loop with your sales team. After a quarter or two of using the scoring model, gather feedback on whether high-scoring accounts are converting and make adjustments.

 


 

2. CAPACITY PLANNING

Capacity Planning helps you as a sales/revenue leader to align your team needs with revenue goals. The exercise gives you an understanding of how much revenue your sales team is expected to bring in and determine the (best) scenario of resources to hit those targets.

The first step here is understanding your revenue goals. If you did $5M in revenue last year and want to grow to $12M the next year, capacity planning backs into that $12M goal by designing the ideal team size. Revenue goals can be simple, e.g. “We want to achieve $12M next year,” or they can get a bit more complexity: “We have an annual goal of $25M, with industry and geography based goals that make that up:

Annual Goal: $25M

  • US: $20M
    • SMB/MM: $18M
    • ENT: $2M
  • EMEA: $3M
  • APAC: $2M

Depending on how many sub-goals you have, capacity can require not only building scenarios to optimize for that annual goal, but ensuring your teams are optimized across each region, vertical, org, etc.

From here, we need to understand average rep capacity.

  • How many deals can an individual close per month/quarter/etc?
  • At what point are we seeing decreasing conversion rates on our deals because reps have too much on their plates?
  • What was the average quota attainment for each team (SMB, MM, ENT, US, APAC, etc) last year?
  • What is the average deal size of your product/service?

You also need to know, or have estimates for, what the ramping period looks like for new hires. On average, SDRs can ramp in 1-2 months, AE’s can take 3-5, and Enterprise sellers can take up to 6 - 7.

An easy formula for revenue per rep looks like:

  • Actual Average deal size: $25,000
  • Actual Deals per quarter: 6 deals

Revenue per Rep = $25,000 x 6 = $150,000 per quarter per rep, or $600,000 annually.

Headcount

Now that we understand individual capacity, we can begin mapping our headcount goals. Looking back at our $12M annual new business goal for the year, with each rep, on average, achieving $600,000 against quota, we would need 20 sales reps to hit that number.

$12M / $600,000 = 20 Reps

Slow down and take a breath

If you know your historical performance, use those averages. If you don't have enough historical performance, factor in an assumed attainment. There are notes at the end explaining assumed attainment and how factor that in to your capacity needs.

Now that we have a capacity requirement, this becomes our baseline, assuming all 20 reps are already fully ramped and productive. Understanding this is a growth goal and will likely require increasing headcount in our sales org, we need to plan for decreased productivity in year 1 for new hires. This is also highly impacted on when these new hires start during the next year.

The example below shows that a new Account Executive is 0% productive (generating revenue) in Month 1. That slowly improves in months 2 and 3, and then we see a dramatic increase to full productivity from month 4 - 7. We have to factor in this ramp time, as well as if this AE is hired in Month 1 of your new fiscal year or Month 7.

Planning for ramping productivity ensures you don't overestimate quota achievement expectations.

You’re seeing how it’s all the small things to think about and plan for that add up. Having a platform that can guide you through all of these steps, and allow you to be confident in your capacity and hiring plans makes a big difference.

Similar to account scoring, below are common issues that leaders run into when building capacity plans.

Underestimating Ramp Time for New Reps

  • The Trap: Organizations often plan based on the assumption that new hires will hit quota from Day 1, or that “their reps” don’t need as much ramp time as the average company, leading to overly optimistic capacity estimates.
  • How to Avoid: Be realistic about the ramp time and understand that different types of hires (Sales Development, Account Executives, etc) have different average ramp times to reach full productivity.

Not Factoring in Quota Attainment Realistically

  • The Trap: Assuming every rep will hit 100% of their quota leads to capacity shortages and missed revenue targets.
  • How to Avoid: Use historical data to estimate realistic quota attainment. If your reps average 70%, build this directly into your capacity planning. This ensures you have the right number of reps to hit your goals, even if some reps fall short.

Overlooking Team Morale and Burnout

  • The Trap: Expecting too much from a smaller team can lead to burnout, causing performance drops or turnover, which will disrupt capacity.
  • How to Avoid: Be mindful of how much pressure your team can realistically handle. Consider spreading accounts and workload evenly to ensure no one is overburdened. A well-rested, motivated team will perform far better than a burned-out one. Our coal mine canary to watch out for are dips in conversion rates in our deal cycles.

 


 

3. BUILDING TERRITORIES

The combination of accurately and up to date account scoring and a strong capacity plan allows you to build territories for your team’s that are:

  • Equitable - Giving every contributor an equal chance to achieve their individual goals
  • Focused - Directing team members toward the best possible accounts in their books.
  • Revenue Optimized - Built around your best accounts with the highest propensity to spend, helping maximize revenue potential for the entire organization.

 

There’s hundreds of ways to slice up a territory or account book, and the best method for your organization is unique to you. This may include:

  1. Geography: The most common method. Divide accounts based on location—EMEA, North America, etc.—or even by state or city.
  2. Industry/Vertical: If certain industries are key to your business, build territories focused on verticals like SaaS, Finance, Healthcare, etc.
  3. Account Tier: Group accounts by size or revenue potential, such as SMB, mid-market, and enterprise territories.
  4. Product Line: If your company sells multiple products, it might make sense to segment territories by which product they’re selling.

 

If you’re a small sales or revenue organization, geographic territories are the easiest way to start. As you scale, it becomes important to look at factors, potentially incorporating multiple metrics into how you design and deploy territories to your teams. Figuring this process out on your own can be rough, especially if it’s your first time. How do you design the best territories for your team? What metric(s) should you focus on? How do we make these territories equitable for my team? How do I help them focus on the best accounts first?

Territories should be tailored to the individual seller's strengths, and ensure equitable coverage based on quota.

One of the most difficult parts of updating and improving territories as you grow becomes how to make these changes without impacting short term revenue. Ensuring you think about things like locking accounts with open opportunities, the existing rep/customer relationship, even a sales rep’s individual skill set becomes important. One thing we’re seeing more and more at Territories.ai is organizations leveraging CRM data to identify rep strengths and weaknesses in specific types of accounts, and leveraging that data to create hyper-personalized territories, e.g:


Sara is a middle of the pack sales rep, consistently hitting goals but never significantly overachieving. As ABC Company is planning their territories for next year their system recognized that Sara has the highest close rate in the company with banks and credit unions, nearly 3X higher than her peers. Her close rate outside of Finserv is slightly below the company average. Even though ABC Company wasn’t ready to formally verticalize their territories, they used their platform to recommend a personalized territory for Sara with an emphasis on Finserv accounts. The following year, Sara was the second highest biller in the company.


It’s key to make sure each rep has enough accounts to work, but not too many. A common mistake is giving reps massive territories with thousands of leads. Prioritize quality over quantity, so they can focus on closing rather than juggling too many contacts. Just because you have 100,000 accounts in your CRM does not mean all of those accounts need to be built into a territory plan. Ideally, you’re only including the required number of accounts to achieve your revenue goal based on your company’s capacity requirements.

Tools have started to pop-up specifically designed to help revenue teams design and build territories. A lot of these tools however are designed for larger, mature sales/revenue operations teams that have spent years manually building territories in Excel. If you’re not a macro-wizard, you’ve historically been stuck making guesses or hiring expensive consultants to try and solve this. AI is helping make this process faster, more intelligent, and reducing the cost of entry as well, so if you’re struggling to do this alone help finally exists.

Building territories and account books is all about maximizing revenue from each sales rep, but there are common mistakes that get made if we’re only thinking about 100% efficiency. These mistakes can be avoided by understanding when they typically happen.

Creating Unequal Territories

  • The Trap: Building territories solely on geography without considering the opportunity or account value in each region. This leads to some reps having far more (or less) opportunity than others. Geography is an easy territory tool, but should never be the only metric.
  • How to Avoid: Balance territories not just by geography but by potential opportunity. Use your account scoring model to ensure each territory has a similar mix of high, medium, and low-value accounts, creating equitable opportunities for all reps.

 

Not Adjusting Territories Regularly

  • The Trap: Many organizations set territories once and never revisit them. Over time, this can lead to unbalanced workloads as new businesses emerge or existing customers grow.
  • How to Avoid: Review territories quarterly or at least semi-annually. Reevaluate based on changes in the market, company size, or new product offerings. Be agile and make adjustments as needed to keep workloads equitable and aligned with business opportunities.

 

Assigning Too Many Accounts per Territory

  • The Trap: Giving reps a large volume of accounts to work sounds good (look at the revenue potential of this territory!), but too many leads can dilute their focus, leading to poor follow-up and lower conversion rates.
  • How to Avoid: Prioritize quality over quantity. Focus on giving each rep a manageable number of accounts they can deeply engage with. The goal is to increase conversions, not just the sheer number of contacts.

 

Ignoring Rep Strengths and Expertise

  • The Trap: Assigning territories without considering a rep’s experience, industry expertise, or existing relationships can hurt territory performance.
  • How to Avoid: When building territories, use the data you already have access to to understand individual rep strengths. If someone has deep experience in the healthcare industry, assign them a healthcare-heavy territory.

 


 

4. MEASURE, OPTIMIZE, ITERATE

Once your territories are built and your team is selling, don’t stop there. The market changes, salespeople move, and data gives us new insights. Revenue organizations that want to stay on top of the market should be evaluating the performance of each territory every quarter. Are certain territories underperforming? Is there an imbalance in the potential of one region over another? Adjust territories and goals as needed.

Gather input from your sales reps. They’re on the front lines and can tell you if a certain industry is a dead zone or if a particular geographic region is oversaturated. Make data informed decisions, but don’t forget that your sales team is a data point as well.

Don’t be afraid to refine your approach. Maybe you’ll find that industry-based territories perform better than geographic ones—or maybe you need to split territories even further as you grow.


5. TL/DR

If you made it this far, just remember that Implementing sales territories for the first time might seem daunting, but by following a structured approach—scoring accounts, building a clear capacity plan, and designing balanced territories—you’ll set your team up for success. Remember, it’s not a one-size-fits-all process, so be ready to adapt as you grow!

*Revenue Per Rep Notes

If we used actual averages and included quota attainment, it would tell us we need 29 reps to achieve that same goal we only need 20 reps for. This is why it's critical to understand if your numbers are based on actual or theoretical averages.There's multiple ways to run this analysis, and doing it the wrong way can lead to significantly over or underestimating your capacity. In the scenario above, we're using ACTUAL AVERAGE deal sizes and deals closed per quarter. This means we are already taking into account the concept of quota attainment, and not assuming all reps average 100% of their quota. If we factor in average quota attainment (say 70%) to the above, then it changes our Revenue per Rep to $105,000 quarterly / $420,000 annually. However, because we're basing our model on ACTUAL historical performance, this means we're duplicating our math.

For newer organizations that don't have enough historical data to look back at actual averages, you can use a THEORETICAL AVERAGE. For a theoretical average, we're making a broader assumption that our average deal size will be $25,000 and reps should be able to close 6 deals per quarter. This is where we need to add in the probability that not all reps will achieve 100% of quota attainment.

  • Theoretical Average deal size: $25,000
  • Theoretical Deals per quarter: 6 deals
  • Assumed Average Attainment: 70%

 

Revenue per Rep = ($25,000 x 6) x 70% = $105,000 per quarter per rep, or $420,000 annually.

Similar posts

Keep up to date on all things Revenue Operations

Be the first to know about new RevOps insights and innoviations to build or refine your sales, marketing, and customer success operations functions with the tools and knowledge of today’s industry.